OVERSEAS VISIT REPORT

IUGG Conference, Birmingham, UK
University of Colorado, USA
Ian Barton
CSIRO Marine
July - August 1999


Itinerary
 21 July  Hobart - Perth
 21-23 July  CSIRO/EOC Meeting
 23-24 July  Perth-London
25 July   London-Birmingham
26-30 July   IUGG Symposium, Birmingham
31-01 Aug   London-Denver
02-06 Aug   University of Colorado
07-08 Aug   Denver-Hobart



CSIRO/EOC Workshop

The agenda and minutes of this meeting are available on the WWW at http://www.cossa.csiro.au . This meeting was attended to assist with the coordination of the Australian remote sensing research program with national collaborators from CSIRO divisions and other institutes. A presentation to this meeting focussed on the SST validation activities in Australia and the associated air-sea interaction studies. The Australian components of this international program are based in Townsville, Perth, and Hobart. At each of these locations ship measurements are made to assist with the validation of satellite-derived products and the associated air-sea interaction studies.

IUGG Meeting, Birmingham 26-30 July

General theme: This meeting was strongly represented by the solid earth and vulcanology community, with lesser representation from the atmosphere-ocean sectors. The meeting included a strong emphasis on the GCOS strategy for international collaboration in the development of climate data sets for future research and operational activities. The GODAE program was discussed in several presentations, and the drifting float ARGO program was also favourably mentioned. Australia is among 12 nations which have signed up to participate in this program, and presentations at this meeting suggest that it will receive strong support in the future.

Presentation of Invited Paper

A paper entitled "Derivation of Global Water Vapour Distributions from ATSR Data" was presented to a session on "The Contribution of Satellite Observations to Global Climate, Ocean, and Terrestrial Monitoring". The abstract of the paper is attached as Attachment 1.

Meeting highlights: Susan Solomon (NOAA) discussed the current vulnerability of the climate system to a major volcanic eruption. This is due to the high levels of CFCs in the upper atmosphere which may lead to massive ozone destruction through chlorine-based reactions between the ozone and volcanic emissions. Dean Roemmich (Scripps Institute Oceanography, USA) and John Woods (Imperial College, London, UK) both gave presentations focussed on global measurements of the marine environment for future climate and other studies. GOOS, GCOS and GODAE were all mentioned. John Woods finished by stating that, in the future, tourism and environment would be the main users and beneficiaries from global measurements of the ocean system. Neville Smith (Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne) gave a strong presentation on GODAE which emphasised the importance of global measurements, and included a plug for the ARGO program.

Other contacts and meetings at IUGG

Bill Rose (MIT):
Discussed his proposal for a NASA satellite to assist in the detection of volcanic ash clouds that are a hazard to aircraft. We discussed the recent assertions of Dr Jim Simpson regarding the use of future satellite data for detection of these clouds. The possibility of using the 8.6 micron channel on MODIS was discussed. We also discussed the status of the Australian airborne detection instrument, and details would be passed on to Dr Fred Prata who leads this project.

Hiroshi Kawamura: Hiroshi is the main contact at NASDA for air-sea Interaction and SST measurement. We discussed plans for the GLI meeting in Kyoto in December and the development of a GLI SST validation plan to be ready for that meeting. We agreed to exchange some information over the coming months. We also discussed the different responses to the NASDA AO and would seek to include any further PIs in our validation planning.

Peter Schluessel: We discussed the development of SST algorithms to derive skin SST from AVHRR data. We also discussed future research activity on air-sea interaction. Peter had recently moved to EUMETSAT and was unlikely to be involved in experimental work in the near future. However he was still keen to see a continuing development of algorithms for skin SST measurement. Such research was intrinsically tied up in heat flux studies and air-sea interaction.

Phone discussion with Dr David Warrilow (UK Dept. of Environment, Transport, and Regions) 28 July

Following the receipt of a letter just prior to departure from Australia I called David Warrilow. The letter from DETR asked if Australia had any interest in ATSR-4 (the next in the ATSR series). We discussed possible funding scenarios in the UK with David stressing that it was unlikely that DETR would be involved and that it was probably time for the next ATSR instrument to fly on a fully operational satellite. Possible support could come from EUMETSAT, UKMO, and ESA. I stated that Australian scientists would be interested in a continuing ATSR program but, like in the UK, a funding source was not immediately identifiable. Nevertheless, if a strong case for Australian involvement could be made, perhaps along the lines on industry development, some funding may be possible. One other option was for Australia to offset some carbon credits for the development of an important international instrument in global climate research. The possibility of meeting in London on 30 July was not possible as David was not in the office that day.

Visit to Imperial College, London, 30 July

Professor John Harries: General discussions on the state of science in the UK, including the universities and the research councils' programs. The research program of the College was described.

Ray Rigby: Discussed the construction and calibration of the new GERB instrument for estimating the earth's radiation budget from a geostationary orbit. The first of these instruments has been calibrated at Imperial College and is now being incorporated onto the METEOSAT Second Generation (MSG) satellite. The new calibration facility at Imperial College was viewed and the general calibration of infrared radiometers was discussed. Two extra GERB instruments are under construction. It is hoped that eventually there will be a GERB instrument on all the geostationary meteorological satellites. Only then will an accurate assessment of the earth's radiation budget be possible from geostationary orbits.

Jon Molloy: A new airborne instrument is under construction at the College. This is a Michelson interferometer for measuring the atmospheric radiance at wavelengths between 12 and 120 microns. A system of internal and external black bodies is used for calibration of the instrument. Experience gathered through the Australian program identified some areas of concern in the aircraft instrument. Plans are to have the interferometer mounted in the UKMO's aircraft by October.

University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 2-5 August

02 August Bill Emery and I visited the NOAA laboratory in Boulder for discussions on the development of infrared radiometers for deployment on ships of opportunity. Bill Emery feels that the only way to get sufficient data to enable a good understanding oh the dynamics of the skin layer is too use such radiometers. The different radiometers developed at CSIRO Atmospheric Research were discussed as well as the methods of operation and the construction of the calibration black bodies.

Bill Emery stated that he was going to approach ONR (US Office for Naval Research) for funding to support another radiometer inter-calibration. The use of Miami as the best venue for such an activity was stressed. We also agreed that for this exercise it was important for the different radiometers to all be used on a ship to confirm their performance at sea. (Plans to do this on the inter-comparison at Miami last year did not eventuate.) NOAA personnel present at this meeting were Drs Joe Shaw and Jim Churnside.

Dr Gary Wick(also at NOAA): At this meeting I gave details of a new strategy for SST validation that was presented at the recent ATSR Workshop in Frascati, Italy. The importance of heat flux measurements stressed as was the range of wind speeds over which some assumptions cloud be made about the skin-bulk temperature difference. We agreed that more, better, measurements were required. Further compilation of good ship data was required and Bill Emery said that he had started a data base and would welcome all new measurements..

03 August: With Brian Shannon, Chuck Fowler, Becky Knewtson, Dan Baldwin, Bill Emery.
MCC currents discussion. Use of larger templates agreed. Also some need for limiting the current speed was required for good retrievals. Whether to use SST or BT data sets was still an open question. Bill showed some comparisons with altimeter data which were done through collaboration with John Wilkin in NZ. We should also try and get some data sets for the open ocean to demonstrate the power on the MCC technique in deriving currents over the global oceans.

Second discussion on MCC: CCAR would look to develop the use if stream functions to smooth out erroneous vectors in the MCC fields.
Bill would look for funding to compare SSTs derived with AVHRR and the TRMM microwave radiometer.

03 August: Down-loaded all the files required for the RAL transmission model. Briefing to U. Colorado staff (Dan Baldwin & Brian Shannon) on the use of the model. I agreed to send over modified versions of the code when major changes had occurred.

ATSR Near-Real Time products: Details of how to down-load NRT ATSR data from the WWW were specified and examples provided. CSU should apply to ESA/ESRIN for a user name and password.

Jay Choi: Real time current forecasting in the Gulf of Mexico. See http://www-ccar.colorado.edu/~jkchoi/gomforecast.html. Could be useful for John Church and David Griffin.

A second altimeter contact was Bob Leben who demonstrated his WWW site at http://www-ccar.colorado.edu/~leben . This site gives global analyses of current and historic altimeter data.

MCC AVHRR/SeaWiFS paper with Chris Rathbone and Paul Tildesley. JAOT reviewers want more pairs - say 3 for each satellite. Look at using radiances or counts for SeaWiFS. Also look at using larger templates and lowering the correlation coefficient threshold.
Other contacts at CCAR: Jeremy Dunn, George Born (Head of Dept.)


ATTACHMENT 1

 

 

DERIVATION OF GLOBAL WATER VAPOUR DISTRIBUTIONS FROM ATSR DATA.

Ian J. BARTON
CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart, Australia 7001
email: ian.barton@marine.csiro.au

 

ABSTRACT:
A new product to be provided by the ATSR instrument team is a global distribution of averaged infrared brightness temperatures on a spatial scale of 18m 10 arc-minutes in latitude and longitude). Data for a one-month period are analysed to demonstrate the potential of these data to provide a vertical and horizontal distribution of water vapour amounts over the global oceans. The six ATSR infrared channels (nadir and forward views at three wavelengths) are applied in a similar manner to those on the infrared sounding channels on the operational meteorological satellites. The weighting functions of the ATSR channels are found to give better vertical resolution in the lower troposphere than the typical channels used in the latest operational instruments.